ATM Cards in
Australia
HEADLINES
|
ATM card transactions value remains flat in 2010 while
volume declines by 2%
|
|
Direct charging leads consumers to restrict ATM use to
machines operated only by their card issuers
|
|
The number of ATMs in Australia increases to 28,000 in
2010
|
|
Non-bank ATMs lead in 2009, accounting for 45% of the ATMs
currently in operation in Australia
|
|
Due to the growth in card-based payments, ATM transactions
is expected to increase in constant value by just 1% CAGR over the forecast
period
|
TRENDS
|
The Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) direct charging
reforms came into effect during March 2009. The reforms promote transparency
in the charges which are levied on the use of ATMs provided by a bank or
other organisation other than the issuer of the card being used to withdraw
funds. Under the reforms, consumers were informed of the cost of withdrawing
cash at these non-issuer ATMs, known as ‘foreign ATMs’, before processing the
transaction. Since the implementation of the reforms there has been a
significant change in trends away from consumers accepting the charges to use
foreign ATMs towards consumers restricting their use of ATMs to those of
their card issuers. The total number of transactions at all ATMs in Australia
declined by 2% in 2010 in the wake of the direct charging reform, whilst the
proportion of ATM transactions value stemming from transactions through
foreign ATMs fell from 40% before the reforms to 35% during 2010. Consumers
who found themselves with no option but to use a foreign ATM preferred
instead to withdraw large amounts of money or chose to pay for goods at the
point of sale using a debit card.
|
|
Despite the trend away from cash based payments in
Australia, cash is still the most commonly used method of payment for low
value transactions. According to the June 2009 report of RBA, cash still
accounts for 70% of all payments made in Australia. Furthermore, cash
accounts for 94% of all transactions under A$10 and 74% of all transactions
between A$11 and A$25. Withdrawing cash from an ATM, making a withdrawal
over-the-counter in a bank branch and taking cash-outs when paying with a
debit card at points of sale remained the main sources of accessing cash in
Australia during 2010. The value of cash-outs at points of sales increased by
6% during 2009/10, which was largely due to Australian consumers planning
ahead in order to avoid the fees incurred through the use of foreign ATMs,
which also explains the stagnation of ATM withdrawals in value terms.
|
|
Prior to the introduction of RBA’s ATM reforms,
transactions through foreign ATMs stood at 47% of total ATM transactions
volume, while the equivalent value measure was 40%. The direct charging
reform has led to consumers sticking to the ATMs of their own card issuing
bank, hence the share of foreign transaction now stands at 40% in 2009, down
from 47% in 2008, falling further to 35% in 2010.
|
|
The cost of using foreign ATMs remains unchanged in the
wake of the implementation of RBA’s reforms. Prior to the ATM reform, users
of foreign ATMs were subject to a varying fee in the region of A$2, most of
which went to their own bank, although the operator of the foreign ATM
received around 40% of this fee. With the introduction of the reform, the order
of distribution reversed. Instead of the issuing bank charging the customer,
now it is the foreign ATM owners who charge the customer. The interchange fee
was abolished and foreign ATM owners now keep 90-100% of the fee. Following
the implementation of the reform, the majority of financial institutions in
Australia stopped charging foreign fees. Customers now pay the direct charge
levied by the ATM operator. ATM owners now have more flexibility to charge
customers. In some cases, such as in the sprawling suburban areas of
Australia’s large cities, the charge is now lower than A$2, while at many
others such as pubs, clubs and airports, the direct charge has risen well
above A$2.
|
|
Another objective of the reform was to increase the supply
of ATMs, as it was hoped that more players would enter ATMs and drive down
the level of the fees. According to RBA, there were 27,100 ATMs in use in
Australia as of June 2009. The number of ATMs declined to 26,600 in September
2009 before recovering to 27,100 in December, according to Australian Payment
Clearing Association. There was an expansion in the number of ATMs owned and
operated by non-bank ATM owners in 2010 as the number of ATMs reached 28,000.
Greater flexibility in pricing has encouraged independent ATM operators to
deploy ATMs in locations which were previously considered not to be viable,
such as Australia’s vast and sparsely populated rural areas.
|
|
Financial institutions and banks have also been
entertaining the idea of expanding their networks of fee-free ATMs as it is
seen as critical to be seen to be competing in ATMs which do not charge
users. Many of these financial institutions are either joining existing
sub-networks or entering into one-way agreements with other networks. In June
2009, National Australia Bank entered into an agreement to join Cuscal’s Redi
ATM sub-network. In addition to joining a sub-network or a one-way agreement,
some larger issuers expanded their own networks of ATMs in 2010.
|
|
Independent ATM operators such as Customers Ltd are
looking towards alternative revenue streams by investigating the potential of
providing EFTPOS services as well as offering mobile phone pre-paid card
top-up facilities through their ATMs and offering advertising space on the
ATMs themselves. Customers Ltd commenced mobile phone pre-paid card top-up
facilities through up to 500 of its ATMs in September 2010.
|
COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
|
Independent ATM operators account for 50% of the ATM
network currently in operation in Australia. Customers Ltd is by far the
largest independent operator, with 5,500 ATMs in operation across Australia.
Customers Ltd is looking at providing outsourcing for its existing fleet of
ATMs owned by the banks. Customer Ltd has a five-year branding agreement with
Bendigo and Adelaide Bank. Cashcard also operates a similar number of ATMs,
and these two independent operators combined controlled 42% of ATMs in
operation in Australia during 2009.
|
|
Due to the abolition of interchange fees under the RBA
direct charging reforms, there has been some changes in terms of
participation from new players. My ATM, for example, is offering individuals
the opportunity to own a portfolio of ATMs as an investment vehicle. My ATM
has reserved 3,000 ATMs and negotiated agreements with the operators of these
ATMs in order to make it easier for investors to enter into ATM ownership. It
is believed that this opportunity has attracted significant numbers of
passive investors as it provides a minimum guaranteed income of A$0.20 per
transaction. However, some investors have experienced no capital gain due to
depreciation of ATMs.
|
|
Financial institutions and banks control the remaining 50%
of the ATM network in Australia. Commonwealth Bank of Australia was the
largest single operator in 2009, with 4,000 ATMs, including BankWest ATMs, in
operation. Westpac Banking Corp was ranked second among banks, with 2,800
ATMs while ANZ Banking Group Ltd operated 2,600 ATMs, placing it in third
position in 2009. Having access to a wider network of ATMs has become
critical for Australian banks in order to compete for deposits. This is
largely because Australian consumers tend to look for ATMs operated by their
own bank in order to avoid foreign ATM transaction fees.
|
|
Although the interchange fee was abolished under the RBA
direct charging reforms, it is still allowed to be levied where it promotes
competition. Institutions pay a one-way interchange fee to make use of the
machines of other ATM networks, which is seen to promote access to a wider
ATM network. By allowing interchange fees, smaller institutions will have
access to a wider network of ATMs than they would if they were to set up
their own network, which would involve a disproportionately high level of
capital investment, as well as increasing their ability to compete with
larger organisations.
|
PROSPECTS
|
RBA is closely monitoring the impact of its direct
charging reforms, which have now been in effect for one year. It has been
acknowledged that the cost of using foreign ATM has not gone down, especially
in remote rural areas and certain locations such as pubs and clubs. There
have been calls for more regulation in order to bring down the cost to
cardholders of using foreign ATMs. It is highly unlikely that the supply of
ATMs in remote locations and pubs and clubs by independent ATM operators will
increase over the forecast period, even though RBA intends to maintain
transaction fees at A$2. The increased supply of ATMs will serve to more
evenly distribute transactions between ATM operators. Furthermore, the cost
of servicing ATMs will exceed the revenue earned, hence making the operation
of ATMs unprofitable for many smaller operators.
|
|
The value of ATM withdrawals at gaming venues is expected
to decline significantly over the forecast period on the basis of
recommendations by the Productivity Commission to reduce the limit of cash
withdrawn at gaming venues from A$2,000 to A$200 in order to tackle the
thorny issue of Australia’s spiralling level of problem gambling. The final
report by the Productivity Commission was handed to the Federal Government on
26 February 2010. The discussion on the recommendation was issued in June
2010. It is anticipated that the recommendation will be taken up as gambling
is seen as an increasingly serious problem in Australia and one which
urgently needs to be addressed.
|
|
The anticipated growth in the card-based payments system
in Australia will also impact the value of ATM withdrawals over the forecast
period. In addition to card-based payments, the increasing popularity of
cash-outs at points of sale will also have a significant impact on the value
of ATM withdrawals. Australian consumers have increasingly been using points
of sale to access cash in the wake of the direct charging reform; cash-outs
increased in value from A$11.6 billion in 2008 to A$12.9 billion in 2009, and
this trend is likely to intensify over the forecast period.
|
|
Greens Party Leader Senator Bob Brown has proposed a bill
to the Federal Parliament which would outlaw the A$2 fees charged by the
major banks to non-customers using their ATMs, while building societies,
credit unions and independent operators would be excluded and still allowed
to charge the fees. If the bill were to be passed, it would provide another
yet opportunity for independent operators, following on from the direct
charging reform, since major banks would lose out on the revenue which they
currently obtain from operating ATMs and it would be more cost effective for
banks to outsource their ATMs to independent operators.
|
|
Since there are incentives for independent ATM operators
to expand their fleets of ATMs due to the freedom they enjoy in terms of
pricing, the number of foreign ATMs is expected to rise during the forecast
period. However, transaction volume through foreign ATMs will decline,
although the average value withdrawn per transaction will be higher.
|