Dissertation Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help
Mahasagar Publications, Mumbai, India-Call +91 9819650213 or email mahasagarpublications@gmail.com

Wednesday 30 April 2014

UK Consumer – Reasons for not Eating Cereal Bars

Cereal Bars - UK - Consumer – Reasons for not Eating Cereal Bars


Key points
              Nearly two in five people (37%) who don’t eat snack bars point to lack of relevance as the reason, one in four preferring other snacks.
              Looks, size and sweetness are all noted as off-putting by around one in six non-users, highlighting these as key areas in product development and marketing.
              Two in five non-users note just one reason for not eating cereal bars, potentially good news for the market.

“Not for me” say two in five
To assess factors and motivations putting non-users off cereal and granola bars, consumers were asked:

“For which, if any, of the following reasons do you NOT eat cereal bars as a snack?”




              Nearly two in five people (37%) who don’t eat snack bars point to lack of relevance as the reason.
              This is not entirely surprising, as much of the marketing in the category has portrayed snack bars as a low-calorie diet product for women or, in the cake of Rice Krispies Squares, as a children’s snack.
              While two in five adults say that they are dieting most of the time, this positioning effectively rules out the other three in five.
              Meanwhile the association with diet products is likely to exacerbate the poor value image, ‘light’ or ‘diet’ products often commanding a premium.
              The few brands looking to pitch the snack bars as a generic snack, such as Nutri-Grain or more recently Alpen, have tried to promote the products simply as tasty, however, this appears to be an area where prejudices die hard, and the snack bars are hard pressed by traditional snack foods.

Unsubstantial
              Preference for other snacks is noted by one in four non-users, signalling potential to attract new users to the category as brands from other areas expand into it.
              Of the specific qualities of snack bars, looks, size and sweetness are all noted as off-putting by around one in six non-users, highlighting these as key areas to consider in both product development and marketing.

“Never buy these. Tried one once – far too sweet.”
-35-44-year-old ABC1 male

“Try making them bigger for the same price and less sweet, even try making them savoury.”
-45-54-year-old C2DE male

Snack bars too sweet for women
              Men are clearly more likely than women to see cereal bars as not for them, or object to the looks. Women are more likely to quote preferring a proper breakfast as a reason against snack bars, as well as their being too sweet.
              Over-45s are the most likely to quote any of the reasons for not eating cereal bars, reflecting the fact that more than half of them quoted two or more reasons, while two in five 16-34-year-olds and half of 35-44-year-olds mentioned just one, signalling them as likely to be the easier converts
              ABs are the most likely group to be put off by the looks and sweetness of cereal bars, while C1s are most likely to prefer other snacks and DEs to look for more substantial alternatives. Nearly half of DEs (46%) say that the bars just aren’t for them.

Two in five put off by just one factor


              Two in five non-users note just one reason for not eating cereal bars, a potentially encouraging finding for the market.
              35-44-year-olds, C1s and the full-time employed are the most likely to name just one reason for not eating cereal bars, suggesting these groups as potentially the easiest to convert.
              Over-45s, the retired and ABs are the most likely to quote three or more reasons for not eating them, making these groups potentially the most challenging to attract.

Key analysis: Of those with just one reason, one in three quote lack of relevance and one in six the preference for other snacks, just one in 12 listing the looks, taste or size. While the latter may be easier to tackle, the former, for example through targeted marketing, could bring about greater returns.