Dissertation Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help
Mahasagar Publications, Mumbai, India-Call +91 9819650213 or email mahasagarpublications@gmail.com

Tuesday, 15 April 2014

Morgan Stanley SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis Report on Morgan Stanley

 COMPANY OVERVIEW

Morgan Stanley (or ‘the company’) is a global financial services firm. The company provides investment banking, financial advisory services, wealth management, asset management, credit cards and other related consumer products and services. Morgan Stanley operates in the Americas, Europe, Asia Pacific, the Middle East and Africa. It is headquartered in New York City, New York, and employed 57,061 people as on December 31, 2012. The company recorded revenues of $26,112 million during the financial year ended December 2012 (FY2012), a decrease of 19% over FY2011. The operating profit of the company was $515 million in FY2012, a decrease of 91.6% over FY2011. The net loss was $30 million in FY2012, compared to a net profit of $2,067 million in FY2011.

SWOT ANALYSIS of Morgan Stanley

Morgan Stanley is a leading underwriter of equity-related securities, convertible securities and American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). It also commands a strong market position in underwriting fixed income securities including investment grade debt, non-investment grade instruments, mortgage-related, and other asset-backed securities. Morgan Stanley is a key player in the financial services industry and leverages its reach, brand name and market position to increase association with top clients. However, increasing competition could impact the company’s profitability.

Strengths

Leading positions in the securities market sustains revenue visibility

Morgan Stanley is a leading underwriter of equity-related securities, convertible securities and
American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). It also commands a strong market position in underwriting fixed income securities, including investment grade debt, non-investment grade instruments, mortgage-related and other asset- backed securities, tax-exempt securities and commercial paper and other short-term securities. In FY2011, Morgan Stanley’s institutional securities segment was ranked the first leading player in global mergers & acquisitions (M&A), and the leading player in global IPO and global equity. Morgan Stanley's subsidiary ‘Morgan Stanley Investment Management’ is one of the largest global asset management organizations. Leading position in the securities market sustains the company’s revenue visibility.

Well diversified business mix sustaining revenue visibility

Morgan Stanley’s business mix is well diversified. For instance, in FY2012, global wealth management segment accounted for 51.4% of revenues with the rest from institutional securities segment (40.1%), and asset management segment (8.4%). Global wealth management segment’s revenues in turn were from a variety of sources including brokerage of securities and trading, asset allocation, annuity products, and cash management services. Institutional securities division’s revenues were also diversified with a well balanced mix consisting of equity, fixed income, and investment banking. Well  diversified business mix is sustaining the company’s revenue visibility.

Increasing equity contributing to strong capital position

Morgan Stanley’s equity capital has been increasing in the recent years. For instance, the company’s equity capital increased from $57,211 million in FY2010 to $62,109 million in FY2012. As a result of which, the company’s tier 1 capital ratio increased from 15.5% at the end of FY2010 to 17.7% at the end of FY2012. Likewise tier 1 common ratio increased from 10,2% at the end of FY2010 to 14.6% at the end of FY2012. Moreover, Morgan Stanley increased its global liquidity reserve to $182 billion at the end of FY2012 from $171 billion in FY2010. In FY2011, the company negotiated two significant transactions to further strengthen its balance sheet (1) conversion of the company’s stock owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. (MUFG), which increased the company’s common equity capital by $8 billion and it also eliminated legacy exposure through a settlement with MBIA. This settlement significantly reduced risk-weighted assets and increased the pro forma tier 1 common ratio by approximately 75 basis points by the end of 2012 under the proposed Basel III framework.  Therefore, increasing equity capital is contributing to strong capital position.

Weaknesses

Exposure to distressed institutions leading to loss booking

Morgan Stanley has substantial exposure to distressed institutions such as monoline insurers. Due to the exposure to distressed monoline insurers, the company suffered losses of $1,838 million in FY2011, compared with losses of $865 million, and $232 million in FY2010, and FY2009 respectively. As the company’s exposure to monolines is still significant, it could continue to book losses until either the exposure is reduced significantly or the monoline industry’s prospects improve dramatically.

Exposure to Japan through joint venture with MUFG

Morgan Stanley has substantial exposure to Japan through its joint venture (JV) with MUFG. In that partnership, Morgan Stanley had set up two businesses in Japan that operate on a joint venture basis. One business is operated and risk managed by Morgan Stanley. The other is operated and risk managed by MUFG.  MUFG has a 60% economic interest in each joint venture while Morgan Stanley’s is 40%. Morgan Stanley recorded a loss of $783 million and $62 million in FY2011 and FY2010 respectively, due to its 40% stake in the JV. The loss was associated with trading results and write-downs in its fixed income business, operating expenses, and other costs. This loss is reflected within institutional securities in the other revenue line item. Though the company recorded income of $152 million through this JV in FY2012, there is no assurance that these integrations will yield all of the positive benefits anticipated. Morgan Stanley could continue to book losses from its JV with MUFG as the operating environment in Japan has been tough post the recent tsunami.

Over dependence on the US market increasing the business risk

Morgan Stanley is more dependent on the US market in comparison to other geographies. For
instance, in FY2012, the company derived 77.4% of its revenues from the US market, where as it
derived 11.8% of its revenues from Europe, the Middle East and Africa and 10.9% of its revenues from Asia. Morgan Stanley’s increasing concentration in the US increases the risk of negative financial impact owing to events that affect the US economy. Concentration of operations in the US not only increases its exposure to local factors, but also deprives the company of more revenues from high growth markets in Asia and other Latin American countries.

Opportunities

Favorable outlook for global mergers and acquisitions

Global mergers and acquisitions (M&A) is likely to be favorable in 2012. According to industry sources, in FY2012, global M&A value touched $2.7 trillion, down 2% from FY2011. Despite the overall decrease in M&A, the last quarter of 2012 saw a volume of $908.6 billion, the highest quarterly total since the last quarter of 2007 ($1 trillion). In spite of many uncertainties, the trend of increased transaction value in the fourth quarter of 2012 is expected to continue in FY2013, as indicated by increased consumer confidence according to industry sources. Favorable trends could help Morgan Stanley to be the leading players in global M&A league tables helping it expand fee and related income from those deals.

Asia-Pacific wealth market likely to offer growth opportunities

The population and wealth of Asia-Pacific's high net worth individuals (HNWI) increased significantly over the last five years (2007-12), according to industry sources. Compared to the rest of the world, population and wealth of Asia-Pacific’s HNWIs grew at double and triple rates. In particular, Hong Kong and India experienced the most significant gains in HNWI population and wealth in 2012, following steep declines in 2011. Hong Kong’s HNWI population grew by 35.7% and their wealth by 37.2%, while India’s population grew by 22.2% and their wealth by 23.4%. Japan and Taiwan experienced steady growth at 4.4% and 7% respectively. Asia-Pacific’s Ultra HNWI population and wealth grew 15.4% and 17.8% respectively, while that of the rest of the world expanded by 9.7% and 9.4% respectively. Building on this trend of strong performance in 2012, Asia-Pacific region is positioned to become the largest wealth market by population by 2014.With Morgan Stanley launching its wealth management operations and strengthening its presence in Asian countries, the company is set to benefit from the growth in the Asia-Pacific wealth management market.

Positive outlook for asset management industry and custody bank sector

The global asset management and custody banks sector is forecasted to grow at a compounded
annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.1% during 2011-16. As per MarketLine, the global asset management and custody banks sector grew by 2.7% in 2011 to reach a value of $82,599.1 billion. In 2016, the global asset management and custody banks sector is forecast to have a value of $100,984 billion, an increase of 22.3% since 2011.The Americas accounts for 63.4% of the global asset management and custody banks sector value. The main factors driving this growth would include the need for private individuals to make provision for their pension requirements. Positive outlook for asset management industry and custody bank sector could provide revenue and profit expansion opportunities for Morgan Stanley.

Threats

Regulatory and legislative changes in the US

Legislation proposing significant structural reforms to the financial services industry is being considered in the US Congress, including, among other things, the creation of a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, which would have broad authority to regulate financial service providers and financial products. In addition, the Federal Reserve Bank has proposed guidance on incentive compensation at the banking organizations it regulates and the US Department of the Treasury and the federal banking regulators have issued statements calling for higher capital and liquidity requirements for banking organizations. Complying with any new legislative or regulatory requirements and any programs established there under by federal and state governments to address the current economic crisis could have an adverse impact on Morgan Stanley’ results of operations.

Intense competition likely to keep margins under pressure

There are nearly 700 financial firms from around the world that compete in the US market to provide investment management services to fund investors. Nearly 60% of the US fund and trust sponsors are independent fund advisers, and these sponsors manage more than half of investment company assets. Banks, insurance companies, securities broker-dealers, and non-US fund advisers are other types of sponsors in the US marketplace. Historically, low barriers to entry have attracted a large number of investment company sponsors to the fund marketplace in the US, and active competition among these sponsors has led to squeeze on margins (front-end and back end loads charged by mutual fund companies). These low barriers to entry led to a rapid increase in the number of fund sponsors in the 1980s and 1990s. However, this trend has reversed itself since 2000. About 387 fund advisers left the fund business from 2000 through 2009; at the same time, about 265 new firms entered. So, the competition in the industry continues to be intense and dynamic. As a result, margins are expected to be under pressure for companies that operate investment funds.

Consolidation in fund management industry

The fund management industry has undergone major consolidation in the recent years. For instance, in January 2011, Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. (formerly Cohen and Co Inc.) acquired JVB Financial Holdings, LLC (JVB), an investment firm specializing in the wholesale distribution of fixed income securities, by the company’s subsidiary Cohen Brothers, LLC. Also in February 2011, Sprott Inc. acquired Global Resource Investments, Ltd., Terra Resource Investment Management, Inc. and Resource Capital Investment Corporation (collectively, the Global Companies). Further in April 2012, Apollo Global Management LLC acquired Stone Tower Capital LLC, an alternative credit manager with approximately $18 billion of assets under management (AUM) across a variety of alternative credit funds. It is now clear that players in the industry are looking to up their scale through consolidation. Ongoing consolidation is creating larger rivals with diversified businesses who could take away market share from the company

If you want SWOT Analysis Report on Morgan Stanley, contact Mahasagar Publications.