Dissertation Writing Help

Dissertation Writing Help
Mahasagar Publications, Mumbai, India-Call +91 9819650213 or email mahasagarpublications@gmail.com

Wednesday, 9 April 2014

Gammon India SWOT Analysis Strategic Management

Dissertation Writing Help -Gammon India SWOT Analysis Strategic Management 

SWOT Analysis Report on Gammon India-Dissertation Help in Strategic Management


SWOT Analysis of Gammon India- Dissertation Outline for Strategic Management Topic


Strengths

Gammon is well placed within the Indian infrastructure sector, meaning it can take advantage of opportunities as they arise.

• Gammon has a presence in the infrastructure sectors in Asia, the Middle East and Africa.

Weaknesses

 It was hit by higher finance costs and currency fluctuations, dampening Q109/10 results.

Opportunities

 India's strong population growth and a growing economy is fuelling demand for infrastructure.
India's government is looking to improve the regulatory regime to make the business environment more attractive for private sector companies looking to invest in infrastructure. It is also opening up the sector to private companies through public private partnership (PPPs).

Threats

Lack of widely available domestic expertise to take on large infrastructure and civil engineering projects.

Infrastructure fund raising has soared in recent years as investors took heed of the asset class' long term benefits. The primary factor that has fuelled the momentum and galvanised interest from the cash-rich pension fund community into infrastructure were the low yields on offer in traditional safe-havens, such as US treasuries. We have been following the trend as new institutional investors came into the market. With yields now rising -especially in the long term end of the curve- we explore what the outlook is for infrastructure investments in a rising yield environment.

Our assessment is that, while the diversification of institutional investors' portfolios into infrastructure (inter alia) was certainly galvanized by the persistently low yields of Treasuries and successive rounds of quantitative easing, the rise in yields will not change this trend, though it could decelerate it. We consider three factors behind this view.

Firstly, the share of infrastructure assets in portfolios of major pension funds remains low, therefore there is no major opportunity cost associated with keeping capital within infrastructure funds.

Secondly, infrastructure remains a good match for the maturities of liabilities especially of pension funds, therefore the underlying merits of such an investment strategy are firmly established.

Thirdly, while tapering talk in the US has fuelled the rise in long term Treasury yields, the aggressive monetary easing in Japan has opened up the prospect of fresh funds flowing into infrastructure (either directly via equity or funds) from Japanese investors who are wary of a new risk environment in the domestic bond market. The US$100bn Japan Pension Fund Association is already spearheading this with one investment nearly completed in the Midland Cogeneration Venture in Michigan and plans to invest up to US$1.5bn in Australia, the US and Europe.

The main risk we see associated with rising yields is related to the opportunity cost of long term infrastructure projects. With the US Treasury yield curve becoming steeper, the net present value of projects will edge downward, deterring long term investments to the benefit of short-term projects. This could be manifested in lengthier timeframes for project financing to be finalised for larger projects. It could also accelerate a trend we have seen associated with the rise of institutional investors and pension funds in the market and the reduction in appetite to go through funds of funds - therefore prompting a reduction in fund raising.

While infrastructure fundraising has been reaching new highs, this is due to a few major funds concentrating the majority of capital following large scale fundraising. Global Infrastructure Partners (GIP) significantly bolstered the 2012 infrastructure funds market with their second fund that raised US$8.25bn in Q4 2012. According to data by Preqin, unlisted infrastructure funds have secured US$14.5bn in new commitments in the first half of 2013, nearly 80% higher than the same period the year before. About 40% of the total raised so far this year. However, it is noteworthy that while the fundraising activity is higher compared to last year, there are still 144 unlisted funds looking to raise a total of US$93bn by the end of this year; nearly impossible in our view, and suggesting that not only is competition high, but also that compared to expectations, what has been raised thus far is about 15% of the target.